Thus, the project's investigators concluded that their assessment tool was valid and consistent with current practice expectations in Physical Therapy. Validating a standardized patient assessment tool using published professional standards.
This research, which helps connect classroom teaching and assessment to practice, is the first of its kind in physical therapy education to use published professional documents to validate a standardized patient assessment tool.
Let's assume that you found out weeks after you administered the QAI to your client that the QAI did not measure anxiety as it was supposed to. This means that the interpretations of the QAI results that you made related to your client's level of anxiety were not valid.
As a result, any inferences that you drew based on the test would not be accurate.
The first question you ask yourself is 'What does the QAI measure?
' You read the test manual, which notes that the QAI is used to assess the level of anxiety for adults and adolescents.
As important as these features are in an assessment tool, there is a far more important factor to consider – like how the test was developed.
Although there are currently hundreds of psychological assessments that are available, it’s important to remember that not all assessments are created equal.
During standardized patient encounters students have to demonstrate advancing skills over a series of four encounters which correspond with practice expectations found in Physical Therapy core professional documents such as .
According to thirty academic and clinical educators who rated the match between the standardized patient assessment tool criteria and statements found in these documents, ninety-six percent (22/23) of the criteria agrees with at least one of the documents at statistically significant levels.
The second question that you ask yourself is related to the validity of the QAI, or how well the QAI measures what it was designed to measure.
To answer this question, we will look at three different subdivisions of .
Here are 3 things that set scientifically-validated tools apart from the rest: 1.